Rolex sign
Primary tabs
Submitted by Unknown user (not verified) on Wed, 2010-06-09 04:00
When was the Rolex sign removed from the top of the building in Central? Which building rooftop was it on? It's sad because that display was so much part of HK just like the TST Railway Station Clock Tower, the Peak Tram, and the Star Ferry itself.
Forum:
Rolex sign in Central
It must be later than 1975
It must be later than 1975 because the sign was still there when I returned to HK in 1981. When I came back to HK again in 2007, it was gone. Do you recognize what building that the sign was on- the whole building might have been demolished and replaced?
Re: Rolex Sign
I think the building with the Rolex sign was the Realty Building.
Does the building still
Does the building still exist?
Rolex Sign
The Rolex sign appears to have disappeared from my pictures about the time the One IFC Building was constructed directly in front of the Realty Building which blocked the advertisment's visibilty from the harbour and potential customers. IDJ
Rolex sign in Central
Certainly before 1956 when the Star Ferry Terminal was completed.
I thought I had written a
I thought I had written a reply but somehow it got lost in the cyberspace.
First of all, I'd like to thank you for posting the two recent pictures depicting the Rolex sign on the roof of a much older and shorter building.
I can't imagine how many millions of dollars per year is required to put up a sign like that in Central overlook the harbor if Rolex decided to continue advertising like before......whew!
Anon
ANON, I think if you wish to contribute to this website, please use another pseudonymn or log in becauese it is hard to distinguish between ANON and ANON.
With all due respect, I
With all due respect, I don't understand the difference between posting as an anon or to ID ourselves who we are. I can see if this was a personal or a dating website, but this is just an informational forum where we all share pictures and info about HK. If you have the answer(s) or picture(s), post them; why would you care who the OP was.......unless there are members in this forum whom you wish to ignore?
Anonymous
I can understand Moddsey's point. Is "Anonymous" the default for this site (I don't know)? The problem is an earlier post mentioned losing a comment in cyberspace, but how are we to know - out of all the anonymous comments - which one you are referring to?
Anyway, I'm going to make an incredible stab in the dark and assume you meant this one:
http://gwulo.com/node/6589#comment-12840
however, because it was written by 'anonymous' I can't say for sure. Perhaps you would like to confirm. Anyway, I'm going to assume you are the same person and therefore solve the mystery of your disappearing post (i.e. you posted it in another thread).If you had signed in properly (perhaps identifying yourself as anonymous1 so as not to confuse you with all the other anons) then you would've been able to track your posting history and save you having to repeat your comment.
There's nothing sinister going on, it's just that so many people post as 'anonymous' it's difficult to know which one is which and, as illustrated, may lead to some confusion.
Anonymous or User ID?
Whichever you prefer! The main goal of the site is to encourage people to share their knowledge of Hong Kong's history, and it's your choice how you much information you leave about yourself.
If you choose to create a User ID and log in you get several benefits:
Logged-in users also see an extra tab, 'My Recent Posts'. That lists everything (forum post, articles, photos, etc) that you've ever written, or left a comment on. It's the quickest way to find things you've written before, and check if anyone has replied to them.
A less obvious benefit is that other readers can recognise when you post. It helps us get to know what you're interested in. In the longer run that can help us bring things to your attention you might be interested in.
Finally, it's worth noting there are more options than simply Anonymous or logged in. When you write something here you can identify yourself as:
Regards, David
Dave, Thanks for removing
Dave,
Thanks for removing my dupe reply and the unauthorized "replica Rolex watches" link.